A couple of weeks ago my great friend and brother-in-law-in-law (or whatever you call your sister-in-law's husband) wrote a blog about church called, stirring the pot 1. The blog entry 'stirred the pot' because it mused about a Church centered upon relationships rather than on buildings. Often times church buildings provide the space and structures in which to originate and maintain relational connections for Christians. What if this was not the case?
What if Church was only about relationships and had nothing to do with church buildings? What if a common church building did not exist for a group of Christian friends? (we are musing here) What if the things that are held as sacred along with certain faith practices and structures were determined by the depth of distinct relationships rather than the strength of certain denominations? If this was the case (I muse) then relationships would be dependent (even more so) upon their depth with one another for continued fellowship rather than the place at which they meet.
My brother-in-law-in-law referred to this depth of relationship as being 'knee-deep' in each others lives. This is a phenomena that he has never experienced in his Christian life with two possible exceptions. Only two times in his Christian life has he developed relationships with a group of believers that came close to having a knee-deep depth. I imagine knee-deep relationships as equal to volunteering to wade through quick sand. This would not be the same type of quick sand encounter that you see in Western movies--not the kind where earthy vines or horses' reins are dangling within grasp. It is the kind of quick sand encounter that is life giving--one surrenders life as they know it in a knee-deep relationship. Sadly, I think, most believers that I have met (and I would count myself among them) have rarely encountered this type of relationship with another person--much less with a group of people.
I think part of the struggle in being knee-deep in each other's lives is that we own so much private space and the public space that we share is too often sparsely and infrequently populated with each other's company. Even if I would invite someone to be knee-deep in my own life it would be a difficult task for a normally employed and otherwise occupied person to undertake. I think that any solution would have to involve a lifestyle change around shared spaces, public and private.
I began to ponder life-style changes for the sake of these types of relationships a few years back. Dorm life in college often leant itself to knee-deep relationships whether one liked it or not. Likewise, living with a house-hold of bachelors also leant itself in those directions. However, now that I am married more drastic measures are likely needed to make these relationships possible.
This past weekend my wife and I had some good friends from Chicago stay with us. It was a pleasure that we partake in about once or twice a year--each others company I mean. Admittedly we probably refreshed ourselves as well as wore ourselves out (having only 5 hours of sleep on the last night didn't help). It is easy to wear yourself out with people that you love and seldom see. It is impossible to get enough of them in one extended weekend so we cram as much knowing and being known as we can into that short time frame. I do not regret my tiredness at all. Maybe one of these trips we will pace ourselves, but I secretly hope not.
I mention this because I have only a small handful of friendships that I would voluntarily enter into quick sand. Figuring out ways in which to share public space might be the easiest task. My wife and I would choose our jobs, careers, place to raise our kids, homes and subsequent lifestyle around these relationships. I also, however, would permanently give up my private space to my Chicago friends (along with a few others). Yes, I would live in the same small house and share one small bathroom with them indefinately--although, we would have to learn to pace ourselves relationally. Even so, I muse that this would only create a more conducive setting in which we would be knee-deep in each others lives--the rest is up to us.
In this day--I muse--where individuality has taken its toll on our spiritual faith and practices, we need to begin to contemplate how to live knee-deep in our relationships with others. This will undoubtedly require sacrifice. It may even require the trading in of our freedom to do and own what we want for the freedom that comes from a deeper knowing and being known.
The difficutly I have in imagining such a world is the fact that it is so far removed from any social paradigm I have experienced. My family life growning up was a collection of private spaces owned by separate members of my family whose borders were seldom crossed. It sounds so great, but what would it really be like?
ReplyDeleteThere is so much appeal to this idea it's hard to imagine why more people aren't doing it.
I guess experimentation is the only way to find out if it can work (and thrive) in North America. If we had the ability to look, I know we would find such living arrangements among people who live in areas of the world less affected by materialism.
I think the true test for Brett (and cap'n crunch) is when presented with the opportunity to seek such a shared living arrangement, will we do it? How far are we willing to bend our lives to live such a life?
Thanks for the comment, cap'n. I am not sure what I will do when faced with all the possibilities of life. I am not ever sure that what we are talking about is feasible or worth while in America. I'd like to think that it is...
ReplyDeleteIn Kosovo, some of the Albanians and Serbs that I talked to were amazed at how far my wife and I lived from family and friends. They were also amazed at how seldom we saw each other. Those that I talked to definitely did not have the same concept of space that we often do in America.